Legal Opinion

Hilliard v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Game Commission

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1970No. Civ. A. 69-748PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOURLEY, District Judge.

In this proceeding, plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from taking plaintiffs’ farm lands by exercise of the pow er of eminent domain. Jurisdiction is founded solely upon the alleged existence of numerous questions arising under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In response to the Complaint, defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss and an Answer, raising therein, among other defenses, the defenses of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and res ad judicata. A hearing has been held upon plaintiffs’ request for preliminary injunction and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Martin v. CreasySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  2. Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Mertes v. MertesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  4. Allain-Lebreton Company v. Department of the Army, New Orleans District, Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Cyclops Corp. v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API