Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Brett

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This action to quiet title to Permit No. 1 and Permit No. 2 lode claims was brought by respondents in *127support of an adverse claim filed in the Coeur d’Alene land office against the application of appellant for patent for the U. S. and Daucher lode claims. Judgment went for respondents, from which appeal was taken.

In the trial court the sole issue to be determined was whether the annual labor required by law was actually performed on the U. S. and Daucher claims for-the year 1913. The trial judge found that such annual labor was not performed, and the sole question for this court to determine…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fritcher v. KelleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caravelis v. CacavasIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Crumpacker v. Bank of Washington CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Powelson v. KinneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. McKean v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API