Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 29, 1941No. 1195-O'CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

This is an action for the recovery of $7,821.89, including interest thereon, which was allegedly illegally assessed against and collected from Todd W. Johnson, the plaintiff, by the United States' Department of Internal Revenue, as income tax; and also to allow a certain deduction for business expenses. The controversy is predicated upon the following facts:

During 1921 the plaintiff, Todd W. Johnson, married Esther Jeanne Johnson, and thereafter the plaintiff and his then wife accumulated considerable- property, tangible and intangible, in the aggregate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boehm v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
  2. Blackmer v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Willcuts v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. Ellis v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
  5. Ellis v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  2. Howard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  3. Harrington v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  4. Howard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  5. Howard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API