Brown & Root, Inc. v. Hempstead County Sand & Gravel, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ROY, District Judge.
The Court enters the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in this action:
Findings of Fact
All facts agreed upon by the Parties as stated in the Stipulation of Facts filed April 4, 1984 are hereby adopted.
Conclusions of Law
1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of and the Parties to this action which was removed from the Circuit Court of Hempstead County, Arkansas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 and § 1446.
2. Priority of liens is a question of Federal law. Aquilino v. U.S., 363 U.S. 509, 80 S.Ct. 1277, 4 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. T. C. Trigg, and Cross-Appellants, First State Bank, Crosset, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Williams v. Pulaski County Election Comm'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- McKim v. Highway Iron Products Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. Hempstead County Sand & Gravel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. Hempstead County Sand & Gravel, Inc. And Wilson, Gunter & Walker. Pike Co. Bank of Murfreesboro, Arkansas v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985