Summers v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion.
Hunter, C. J.
I concur only in the ultimate result of the majority opinion. However, I must disagree with the reasoning advanced, because in my view it fails to discuss and actually avoids the frailty of the proceedings before us when measured by the well established statutory requirements of the Juvenile Act and case law precedents establishing rights of juveniles. By avoiding any discussion of the Juvenile Act and the case law of Indiana as well as the rules announced by holdings of the Supreme Court of the United States, the legal discussion contained therein has no…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Robertson v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- McCord v. BrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.