Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Szerdahelyi v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Concurrence

Bloom, J. (concurring).

While I am in accord with the end result reached in the opinion of my brother Asch, I reach my conclusion by a somewhat different process of reasoning. Accordingly, I am constrained to set forth my views at some length. I am of the opinion that the primary issue presented for our consideration requires that we determine the effect of a tender back of the excess interest paid by the borrower and received by the lender upon an usurious loan.

I

Plaintiff and her boyfriend were tenants in premises 401 East 66th Street, New York City. The building was converted to cooperative…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Lawrence Constr. Corp. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Mooney v. . ByrneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Chase v. . PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Saltser & Weinsier, Inc. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Szerdahelyi v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Fremont Investment & Loan v. DelsolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. In Re General American Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Funding Group, Inc. v. Water Chef, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API