Szerdahelyi v. Harris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurrence
Bloom, J. (concurring).
While I am in accord with the end result reached in the opinion of my brother Asch, I reach my conclusion by a somewhat different process of reasoning. Accordingly, I am constrained to set forth my views at some length. I am of the opinion that the primary issue presented for our consideration requires that we determine the effect of a tender back of the excess interest paid by the borrower and received by the lender upon an usurious loan.
I
Plaintiff and her boyfriend were tenants in premises 401 East 66th Street, New York City. The building was converted to cooperative…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Lawrence Constr. Corp. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Mooney v. . ByrneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Chase v. . PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Saltser & Weinsier, Inc. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Szerdahelyi v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Fremont Investment & Loan v. DelsolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In Re General American Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Funding Group, Inc. v. Water Chef, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2008