Nadle v. L.O. Realty Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Once again, this motion court has ruled on a motion without providing any indication of the reasoning supporting its decision (see, e.g., Lynch v Cyprus Sash & Door, 272 AD2d 260; Manrique v Warshaw Woolen Assocs., 282 AD2d 407; Tsai v Hernandez, 284 AD2d 116). Having previously noted our disapproval of this practice (see, Morales v Living Space Design, 278 AD2d 48), we now take this opportunity to explain the basis for our insistence on the inclusion of the reasoning underlying a ruling. First of all, as the Third Department has had occasion to note:
“Written memoranda…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Dworetsky v. DworetskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Tsai v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Kochany v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Lynch v. Cyprus Sash & Door Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Morales v. Living Space Design, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Krochta v. On Time Delivery Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Laura Mariela R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Johanson v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Crucen v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Velasquez v. Delaware River Valley Lease Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.