Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Sapa Extrusions, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company (“Marvin”)1 manufactures windows, doors, and related products. For more than ten years it purchased painted aluminum extrusions2 (referred to as “lineals”) from Defendant Sapa Extrusions, *997Inc. (“Sapa”),3 which it used to make aluminum-clad windows and doors. Customers who installed these products in coastal locations eventually began to complain that the products were losing paint adhesion, and Marvin undertook extensive (and expensive) repairs. It commenced this action against Sapa in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Werwinski v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sapa Extrusions Inc v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Luckey v. Alside, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Qwest Communications Co. v. Free Conferencing Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Doe v. Anoka CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
- Far East Aluminium Works Co. Ltd. v. Viracon, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.