Legal Opinion

Mees v. North Dakota Department of Transportation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2013No. 20120348PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] The North Dakota Department of Transportation appeals from the district court’s judgment reversing the administrative hearing officer’s decision to suspend Timothy Mees’s driving privileges for ninety-one days for driving under the influence of alcohol. We conclude a reasoning mind reasonably could have concluded the hearing officer’s finding that the officer who administered the Intoxilyzer ascertained that Mees did not have anything to eat, drink, or smoke for twenty minutes prior to the Intoxilyzer test is supported by the weight of the evidence on the entire record.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berger v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Salter v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. ZimmermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Buchholz v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Thorsrud v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pesanti v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Yellowbird v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Ebach v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Kastet v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Olson v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API