Legal Opinion

Haley v. Shute

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 4, 1924Published

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The exception of Mary W. Haley to the order of the probate court vacating the decree accepting the report of the commissioner and extending the time for presenting claims cannot be sustained, if there was sufficient cause for making the order. P. S., c. 192, s. 4. “Whether sufficient cause was shown for the action of the court is a question of fact.” Raymond v. Goodrich, 80 N. H. 215. Whether there was error in dismissing this appeal cannot be determined because no statement, relating to the cause for vacating the decree and extending the time for presenting claims, appears in the agreed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Raymond v. GoodrichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
  2. Norcross v. HaskellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API