Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Parole Board v. Brusgulis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T his complaint by the Massachusetts Parole Board pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1986 ed.), is before us on reservation and report by a single *1011justice of this court. The case, involving the propriety of a grant of habeas corpus relief by the Superior Court which restored Richard Brusgulis to the parole status he enjoyed prior to revocation of his parole on the basis of a criminal indictment against him, is rendered moot by the subsequent revocation of parole based on new and separate indictments. We note, however, that since parole constitutes a variation on imprisonment, Morrissey v. Brewer,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Pina v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional InstitutionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Diatchenko v. District Attorney for the Suffolk District Commonwealth v. RoberioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. White v. GittensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. PaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. FigueroaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Love v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API