Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Banbury

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This action was originally brought in the probate court by appellant to recover money claimed to be due for wages. Judgment was rendered in his favor. An appeal was taken to the district court where the cause was tried by the court and a jury, the latter’s verdict being in favor of respondent. Judgment was thereupon entered in accordance with the verdict of the jury, from which judgment this appeal is taken.

An examination of the record fails to disclose that the notice of appeal has been served upon the adverse party or his attorney, as required by C. S., sec. 7153, which provides, inter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Diamond Bank v. Van MeterIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Adams v. McPhersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Doust v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Chapman v. BoehmIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Anderson v. KnottIdaho Supreme Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Isaak v. JourneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bain v. TolleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API