Legal Opinion

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Glover

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

It may be stated as a general proposition of law that the duty of a consignee to unload cars within the free time given by the published tariffs of the carrier, and .the obligation to pay demurrage for their detention, are classified with other duties and obligations imposed by law, and, where the failure of the consignee to unload within the free time is caused entirely by the intervention of a vis major, the consignee is not liable for demurrage. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Board, 100 W. Va., 222, 130 S. E., 524, 44 A. L. R., 826.

In the case at bar there was evidence to sustain the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. TerrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Western Pac. R. Co. v. Pacific Portland Cement Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API