Legal Opinion

Weidner, III v. McHale

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided November 14, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00339Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Nina Y. Wang Civil Action No. 23-cv-00339-NYW-SBP GARY WEIDNER, III, Plaintiff, v. CLAIRE MCHALE, and KRISTIN AMES, in her individual capacity, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Clare McHale’s Motion for Fees and Costs (“Motion” or “Motion for Fees”) [Doc. 81, filed April 12, 2024].1 Plaintiff Gary Weidner, III (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Weidner”), has not responded to the Motion for Fees, and his time to do so has lapsed.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API