Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Jaffray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1894No. 198PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, Associate Justice.

1. On December 7, 1891, E. Bauman executed a chattel mortgage conveying his stocks of goods, situated in Dallas and Fort Worth, to J. B. Simpson and E. M. Reardon as trustees, to secure certain of his creditors, whom he divided into two classes, preferring class A to class B.

2. On December 8,1891, the B. C. Evans Company, a creditor embraced in said mortgage in class B, sued out an attachment against E. Bauman, placed the same in the hands of the sheriff, and he at once levied the same upon a portion of the stock at Fort Worth embraced in the mortgage. On the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Peet, Sims & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Evans v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. O'Bryan Bros. v. Glenn Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Wallis, Landes & Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson-Brinkman Commission Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Rice v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Seamans Oil Company v. GuyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  4. White v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API