Legal Opinion
Tigress McDaniel v. Michelle Bailey
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 8, 2018No. 17-2117UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel filed in district court an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2012). The district court sua sponte dismissed McDaniel’s complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We affirm the district court’s judgment as modified to re-fleet that the dismissal be without prejudice.
“The standards for reviewing a dismissal under § 1915(e) (2) (B) (ii) are the same as those for reviewing a dismissal under [Fed. R. Civ. P.] 12(b)(6).” Thomas v. Salvation…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Philips v. Pitt County Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Ismael Gonzalez-Soto v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
4Cited by4 opinions
- Borkowski v. DeverDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Echols v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- James v. Omni Charlotte HotelDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Tigress McDaniel v. Michelle BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019