Legal Opinion

Moses v. Drake

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 27, 2015No. 357, 2014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALIHURA, Justice:

Plaintiff-below/Appellant Tricia Moses (“Moses”) raises two arguments on appeal. First, she argues that the January 15, 2014, medical opinion of her treating physician, Dr. Stephen Ogden (“Dr. Ogden”), was sufficient to deny Defendant-below/Appellee Aaron Drake’s (“Drake”) motion for summary judgment on the claim that the medical opinion was legally deficient. Second, she argues, in the alternative, that the denial of her motion to rear-gue was improper given Dr. Ogden’s “clarifications” of his opinion on April 25, and May 14, 2014. We disagree and affirm the decisions below.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. FreemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  2. Floray v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  3. Coleman v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Mammarella v. EvantashSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. O'Riley v. RogersSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Viking Pump, Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLC Insurance AppealsSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  2. Ami Shafrir Berg v. Shai Bar-LaviCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026
  3. Chapman v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LPSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
  4. Creasy v. Georgia PacificSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
  5. Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown, LLC v. Country Life Homes, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API