People v. Jinks
New York Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of committing two class A misdemeanors (petty offenses) by a jury of six and sentenced to a conditional discharge.
*654This court finds no merit to defendant’s argument that he was entitled to a 12-member jury because the trial court could have sentenced him to one year on each charge to run consecutively, citing Duncan v. Louisiana (391 U. S. 145). The Duncan case is distinguishable since a single crime punishable by two years’ imprisonment was involved. Moreover, the constitutionality of the six-member jury system in the District Court has been upheld. (Matter of Soltis…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- People v. . SantoroNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- People v. CianciulliNassau County District Court · 1969