Smith v. Jack Eckerd Corp.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We accepted jurisdiction to review Jack Eckerd Corp.. v. Smith, 558 So.2d 1060 *1322(Fla. 1st DCA 1990), because of asserted conflict with Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Robinson, 472 So.2d 722 (Fla.1985), and Griffith v. Shamrock Village, Inc., 94 So.2d 854 (Fla.1957). After oral argument, we now decide there is no conflict, and therefore the Court is without jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition for review is denied.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, McDonald, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur. BARKETT, J., dissents with an opinion, in which SHAW, C.J., and KOGAN, J., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Griffith v. Shamrock VillageSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Jack Eckerd Corp. v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crown Eurocars, Inc. v. SchroppDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994