Legal Opinion

United States v. John Alford Reeves and Jerry D. Reed

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1970No. 678-69_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellants Reeves and Reed operated a bar in Lawton, Oklahoma, where they sold liquor by the drink. A jury found them guilty of violating 26 U.S.C. § 5691(a) by carrying on the business of a retail dealer in liquors without payment of the required federal tax. The single question on this appeal is whether, under the Marchetti-Grosso-Haynes-Leary line of cases, infra, the timely assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is a complete defense to a prosecution under § 5691(a).

The pertinent federal statutes relating to alcoholic…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Michael E. Pauldino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. ParenteDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
  3. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. BalistrieriDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  5. United States v. One Coin-Operated Gaming DeviceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API