United States v. John Alford Reeves and Jerry D. Reed
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants Reeves and Reed operated a bar in Lawton, Oklahoma, where they sold liquor by the drink. A jury found them guilty of violating 26 U.S.C. § 5691(a) by carrying on the business of a retail dealer in liquors without payment of the required federal tax. The single question on this appeal is whether, under the Marchetti-Grosso-Haynes-Leary line of cases, infra, the timely assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is a complete defense to a prosecution under § 5691(a).
The pertinent federal statutes relating to alcoholic…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Michael E. Pauldino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. ParenteDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. BalistrieriDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
- United States v. One Coin-Operated Gaming DeviceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.