Legal Opinion

Dearborn Foundry Co. v. Rielly

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 23, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

A motion, reserved to the hearing, was made to strike from the record a certain amendment to the bill of exceptions, made after the lapse of the term at which the original bill of exceptions was signed and sealed by the circuit judge, and filed in the cause in that court.

A bill of exceptions which, through inadvertence, omission or mistake, does not fairly and truly represent what actually transpired in the trial court that is material to the case, may be amended at a subsequent term, by order of the trial judge, upon motion and due notice to the adverse party, so as to make it conform to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. O'KeefeIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. East St. Louis Electric Street Railroad v. CauleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Heinsen v. LambIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Gebbie v. MooneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce v. FranklinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. Derby v. PetersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  3. Grand Lodge, Independent Order of Free Sons of Israel v. OhnsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  4. City of Toluca v. ArnoldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  5. Salomon v. EllisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API