Legal Opinion

Mary Patricia Taylor v. Don Dawson, Jailer, Lincoln County Jail

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1989No. 87-6290PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

Where a criminal proceeding is terminated by the declaration of a mistrial to which the defendant did not consent and for which there was no “manifest necessity,” the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment bars retrial of the defendant for the same offense. See United States v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 470, 481, 91 S.Ct. 547, 555, 27 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971) (plurality opinion), quoting United States v. Perez, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 579, 580, 6 L.Ed. 165 (1824). The principles of the Double Jeopardy Clause have been made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PadgettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Sissom v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. Com. v. Pressley, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Danny Curran v. Frederick J. Cowan, Attorney General Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Grimes v. McAnultyKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API