Legal Opinion
Barry v. Time, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 5, 1984No. C-83-4183-MHPPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
I
FACTS
Plaintiff, Pete Barry (“Barry”), is the former head basketball coach at the University of San Francisco (“USF”). Defendant Quintín Dailey (“Dailey”) was a star player on the USF basketball team, and is now a professional basketball player for . the Chicago Bulls. This action for libel (against defendant Time, Inc.) and slander (against defendant Dailey) arises out of two articles in the July 26, 1982 and August 9, 1982 editions of Sports Illustrated, one of defendant Time’s publications. These articles focus on USF’s investigation of charges that Dailey had…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville Hillary Rodham Clinton Little, Brown & Co. George StephanopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- E.H. McDowell in No. 83-3008 v. Michael Paiewonsky, in No. 83-3007Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Gist v. MacOn County Sheriff's DepartmentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- McGarry v. University of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.