Meyer v. United States
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
This is an appeal by F. Meyer from the decision of the board of genera] appraisers affirming the classification for duty of certain imported articles of merchandise.
1Opinion of the Court
TO\YX;8K.\ I), District Judge
(orally). The evidence and sample in this case show that the cotton bureau covers, and like articles, which are its subject, were ornamented with fancy work or effects produced in part by drawing out threads of the fabric, and in part by-binding the remaining ones into groups by the use of needle and thread, so as to form open spaces between them. Fancy work of this character is known as “'drawn work.” The articles were classified for duty as “manufactures of cotton, embroidered,” under paragraph 373 of the act of 1890, — apparently on the theory that the use of…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Lang v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918