Legal Opinion
Burgess v. Burgess
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 27, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
On October 16, 1924, in the Probate Court for the county of Barnstable, a decree was entered in favor of Gertrude L. Burgess, directing her husband, Albert W. Burgess, to pay her $18 a week. In June, 1925, he petitioned for the revocation of this decree, contending that he did not have an opportunity to produce the evidence in his possession to show that his wife was not living apart from him for justifiable cause, “and he further represents that he is unable to make the said payments and that the said Gertrude L. Burgess does not need the same.”
A decree in equity may be reviewed, and probate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McIlroy v. McIlroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Sampson v. SampsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Zeitlin v. ZeitlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Blake v. PegramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Jones v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sullivan v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Kennedy v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Coe v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Conway v. KenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Holyoke National Bank v. DulitzkyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.