Merritt v. Jordan
Supreme Court of New Jersey
The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Grey in his opinion filed in the court of chancery, as follows: The bill in this case is filed by the complainant for an accounting and compensation for services rendered by him to the defendant as salesman and collector. The pleadings in the cause admit the relationship .of the parties, the contracts for complainant’s services, and the nature of the compensation.
Read the full summary
The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Grey in his opinion filed in the court of chancery, as follows: The bill in this case is filed by the complainant for an accounting and compensation for services rendered by him to the defendant as salesman and collector. The pleadings in the cause admit the relationship .of the parties, the contracts for complainant’s services, and the nature of the compensation. The answer insists that the defendant has counter claims sufficient to overcome any compensation to which the complainant might be entitled. The admitted…
1Per curiam
Only those questions presented by the appellant’s petition of appeal have been considered by us. No appeal having been taken by the respondent, the alleged errors in the decree, which, as he argues in his brief, were prejudical to him, are not before us for review. The fact that, in his answer to the appellant’s petition of appeal, the respondent has declared himself to be aggrieved by these alleged errors, does not justify this court in-taking cognizance of them. A party who, considering himself aggrieved by a decree of the court of chancery or any portion thereof, desires to have that…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Estate of HerrmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1939
- In Re BrodersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1933