Legal Opinion
Wuliger v. Cohen
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 7, 2003No. 3:02 CV 1274PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for relief from judgment, Plaintiffs opposition and Defendant’s reply thereto. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds the motion not well taken and denies the same.
Background
Plaintiff commenced this action in July 2002 against Defendant for recovery of commissions in connection with the sale of viatical investments. This case is an outgrowth of the Liberte v. Capwill1 litigation which has spawned related litigation both in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United Coin Meter Company, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad, a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Shepard Claims Service, Inc. v. William Darrah & Associates, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Feathers v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Waifersong, Ltd. Inc. v. Classic Music Vending Harry H. Krouskoupf, Sr. Harry H. Krouskoupf, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baskin v. PitreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025