Legal Opinion

Cocolicchio v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The examination of the corporate defendant through its former employee, William Anderson, may not be ordered. (See McGowan v. Eastman, 271 N. Y. 195.) The order appealed from will be reversed, therefore, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion granted, unless within ten days after service of a copy of the order entered hereon the plaintiffs stipulate that the examination may proceed through John McCormick, the person suggested by the defendant as the proper person through whom the defendant should be examined. In the. event of the filing of such stipulation the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGowan v. EastmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New York Telephone Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Sundell Company, Inc. v. Pioneer Building-Loan & Savings Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Essley Shirt Co. v. LybrandNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. New York Feather Co. v. SpewackNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API