Legal Opinion
Winkler v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 17, 1949No. [No. 25, October Term, 1949.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.
The Young Progressives of Maryland decided to test the policy of the Board of Recreation and Parks in Baltimore City in relation to interracial tennis playing in Druid Hill Park, a public park of that City, on July 11, 1948. This organization was interracial, numbering among its members both colored and white people of all religions and creeds. As a result of this decision, Stanley L. Askin, State Director, and one of the appellants here, wrote to the superintendent of recreation and notified him what was proposed. The superintendent of parks replied to this letter, stating that due to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fay v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bute v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Foster v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821
- Berger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Debinski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Swan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.