Augusta-Aiken Railway & Electric Corp. v. Burdashaw

In the brief of plaintiff in error it is said: “ But it is respectfully contended that his honor in the court below erred in giving in charge to the jury the principle of comparative negligence and apportionment of damages. And this constitutes the only error and issue insisted upon before this court by the plaintiff in error. ” The charge of the court of which complaint is made is as follows: “ If you lind from the evidence in this case that both parties were at fault, and that the plaintiff, by the exercise of ordinary care, could not have avoided the consequences to herself of the…