Hyde and Schneider v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
ON WRIT OP CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. The facts,which involve the validity óf a trial,, conviction and sentence for conspiracy under § 5440 Rev: Stat. are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court 1
225 U.S. 347
32 S.Ct. 793
56 L.Ed. 1114
FREDERICK A. HYDE and Joost H. Schneider, Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 447.
Argued October 23 and 24, 1911.
Ordered for reargument before full bench December 18, 1911.
Reargued May 3, 1912.
Decided June 10, 1912.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 347-349 intentionally omitted]
Mr. A. S. Worthington for petitioners.
Solicitor General Lehmann for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · McKennaJustice McKenna
1
This writ brings up for review a judgment of the court of appeals of the District of Columbia, affirming a conviction of petitioners for the crime of conspiracy.
2
The main question in the case is the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited40 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.