Taylor v. Datig
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Dissent
BISHOP, J., Dissenting.
I dissent. The conclusion reached in the foregoing opinion is in accordance with that reached in a majority of our sister states. To me, however, it seems out of step with modern judicial thought, to be contrary to the dictates of justice, and to be, not only not required by the decisions of our own state, but out of harmony with their latest expressions. Because I am unable to give a rational answer to the query propounded in Larkin v. Saffarans (cited in the majority opinion), “Why shouldn’t the amendment give the court jurisdiction?” and because there is no authority…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Berg v. TraegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.