Brazil v. Arkansas Board of Dental Examiners
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EISELE, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Arkansas State Dental Association. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
*194Plaintiffs have raised numerous claims based on the United States Constitution and the federal antitrust laws against the Arkansas State Dental Association (“Association”) and the Arkansas Board of Dental Examiners. In the Court’s April 6, 1984, Memorandum Opinion, 593 F.Supp. 1354, the Court dismissed four of the five possible antitrust claims raised against the Association. The fifth claim…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sound Ship Building Corp v. Bethlehem Steel Company (Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Robert M. Snell and Rosalie J. Snell, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- E. G. Saenz v. University Interscholastic LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Light v. BlackwellDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1979
- Brazil v. Arkansas Board of Dental ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.