Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Carney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Drrorfrom Cheyenne District Court. The opinion states the case. The plaintiffs in error bring here for review the refusal of the court, at the May term, 1887, to dissolve an order of attachment.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

On the 5th day of August, 1886, the defendants in error commenced an action to recover the sum of $377.53 against the plaintiffs in error in the district court of Cheyenne county. At the same time they caused an attachment to be issued against the debtors and levied upon certain property belonging to them. The affidavit for attachment alleges two grounds; the first is, that the defendants have assigned and disposed of their property, to wit, their stock of drugs and their storeroom and lot in Bird City, •or a part thereof, with intent to defraud, hinder and delay their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McPike v. AtwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. the Farmer's Gin and Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API