Legal Opinion

State v. Upshaw

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1968No. 174PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Convicted of three forgeries, defendant was given three sentences to run concurrently. The commitment to the penitentiary states that these sentences were to begin June 3, 1964. Because the beginning date of these sentences was postponed until the completion of a prior sentence, defendant moved for post-conviction relief under § 21-1-1(93) N.M.S.A.1953. By his motion he sought credit on these sentences for time served in the penitentiary, beginning June 3, 1964. The motion was denied without a hearing; defendant appeals.

The three forgeries were committed while defendant was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swope v. CooksieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deats v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Pena v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Herring v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State v. DeSantosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Deats v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API