Legal Opinion

Beneficial Finance Co. of Amarillo v. Van Shaw

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 1972No. 4515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

On Motion for Rehearing.

The opinion and judgment of this Court dated December 17, 1971 are hereby withdrawn and this opinion is substituted therefor.

This is a summary judgment case. Beneficial Finance Company of Amarillo and W. H. Van Shaw each claim an interest in a flower box refrigeration unit. Beneficial Finance claims a security interest arising from money loaned to Stanley and Valda Hare to purchase the unit. Stanley and Valda Hare rented a building from Van Shaw and Van Shaw claims an interest by virtue of a landlord’s lien.

W. H. Van Shaw’s motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brothers v. Mundell, Munzesheimer & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Berkey & Gay Furniture Co. v. Sherman Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Matter of Einhorn Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Textile Banking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. Congressional Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Wolfe City National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Franklin National Bank v. Boser, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  3. Grandview Farm Center, Inc. v. First State Bank of GrandviewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Leverett Co. v. Arthur A. Everts Co. (In Re Arthur A. Everts Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API