Throne Franklin Shoe Co. v. Gunn
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Jefferson. Heard before the Hon. Thomas Cobbs. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated' in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDowdell, J.
The appeal in this case is from a decree sustaining a demurer to a cross-bill and dismissing the same on motion for want of equity. It is an interlocutory decree, that does not come within the provisions of section 427 of .the Code, and from which an appeal will lie.—Barclay v. Spragins, 80 Ala. 357; Jones v. Woodstock Iron Co. 90 Ala. 545; Festorazza v. Catholic Church, 96 Ala. 178; Nabors v. Morris Mining Co., 103 Ala. 543; Buford v. Ward, 108 Ala. 307.
The statute not authorizing the appeal, this court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter, and will, therefore, ex mero motu dismiss the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barclay v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Buford v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Clark v. SpencerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Nabers v. Morris Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Jones v. Woodstock Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bell v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Sumner v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Worthington v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Bickley v. BickleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.