Nicholson v. City of Westlake
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Richard Nicholson, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing one of his civil rights complaints filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Seeking monetary and equitable relief, Nicholson filed two lawsuits, which were consolidated, against the City of Westlake, its Mayor, the police department, the chief of police, and two police officers. In his first complaint (No.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reed v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Doak Walker and Maurice Turner v. R. Schaeffer, Patrolman, and J. Sheridan, PatrolmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Lucas v. Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Beil v. Lakewood Engineering and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cabot v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Salcedo v. Town of DudleyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Allen v. HutchisonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Detrick v. KCS International Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Fontain v. NestorDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.