Legal Opinion

Miguel v. Miguel

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1920No. Sac. No. 3078PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment against him for $414. The findings of the court are that the plaintiff and defendant were partners in the dairy business on September 23, 1911; that on that day they dissolved partnership, the defendant purchasing the plaintiff’s interest for nine hundred dollars, which was to be paid when the indebtedness of the partnership, which was secured by a mortgage, should be paid by the defendant; that such indebtedness was not paid until June 15, 1917; and that after allowing certain credits there remained due on the nine hundred dollars the sum of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. People Ex Rel. Webb v. Honey Lake Valley Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Dennis J. Sallaz and Marcy Fox v. Eugene (Roy) RiceIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Carrasco v. Greco Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Liebersohn v. Ali (In Re Fineberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API