Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Bestop, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 4, 2001No. 99SC742PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

This appeal involves an aspect of a workers' compensation statute that penalizes a person who disobeys an order of the director or panel. We construe section of 8-483-304(1), 8 C.R.S. (2000), to define four categories of conduct for which a person is subject to sanctions. We determine that the limiting phrase "for which no penalty has been specifically provided" contained in this statute does not modify the category of disobeying a lawful order. Hence, we hold that this statute provides penalties for persons who fail, neglect, or refuse to obey a lawful order of the director or panel, even…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bertrand v. Board of County Commissioners of Park CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Bloomer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Sears v. Penrose HospitalColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. CCC v. District Court for Fourth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Brodeur v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Woellhaf v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Colorado Citizens for Ethics in Government v. Committee for American DreamColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. Sulca v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API