Legal Opinion

William R. Forman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1959No. 15324PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon petition for a rehearing the United States asks us to modify our decision by ordering the cause remanded to the district court for a new trial.

We think this suggestion is a proper one. In our opinion we accepted the position taken by the court below in its instructions that the conspiracy charged “was consummated upon the filing of the individual tax returns.” We then proceeded, upon the authority of Grünewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391, 77 S.Ct. 963, 1 L.Ed.2d 931, to hold that the case had been improperly submitted to the jury with instructions that there might be a conviction if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Beacon Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. United States v. GrunewaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Forman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,460 United States of America v. Donald EuckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Dezendorf v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. Ross Huebner, United States of America v. John WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. William R. Forman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API