Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Whipple

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order should be affirmed.

*1032In providing a general bequest for the wife, the will did so in terms of a fraction of the "estate remaining after the deduction of debts, funeral and administrative expenses”. It in no other way qualified the definition of "estate” so as to create a different base for the computation of the amount of that bequest.

In the absence of the expression of a contrary intention (cf. Wetmore v Parker, 52 NY 450, 463; Matter of Ginsburg, 27 Misc 2d 586, 588), a will speaks from the time of death (Beetson v Stoops, 186 NY 456, 460; Matter of Gernon, 35 Misc 2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Sulz v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Beetson v. . StoopsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. In re the Estate of BasileNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  5. In re the Estate of GernonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Accounts of Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API