Legal Opinion

Buell v. Tate

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1844PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR to the Dearborn Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

— Debt by the assignee against the maker of a promissory note for 160 dollars. The defendant pleaded, that the note was given for a part of the price of a lot of ground purchased by him of the payee of the note, and by the latter conveyed to him by a general warranty deed; that the vendor falsely, with intent to defraud the defendant, represented that the land was free from incumbrance, and thus induced him to purchase the same, and give the note ; that, in fact, the land was subject to a mortgage previously executed by the vendor for 10,532 dollars, which was in full force at the time of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whisler v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Watson Coal & Mining Co. v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Wimberg v. SchwegemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Ricker v. PrattIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Calhoun v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Arnold v. CurlIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API