Legal Opinion

Wheatley v. Drennen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 29, 1945No. 4-7724PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grieein Smith, Chief Justice.

The question is whether the obligation of a written contract to sell real property was discharged by substitution; and (a) if the answer is that it was not, what is payable to compensate damage?

On the 24th of June, 1944, Mrs. C. T. Drennen acknowledged in writing that she had received $500 “as a deposit and binder” on designated property, including furniture. The balance of $6,250 was payable when an examination of the abstract should show good title, at which time the deed was to be executed.

Mrs. Drennen had been away from Hot Springs for quite a while. Upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duty v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. J. L. Metz Furniture Co. v. Thane Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Drennen v. WheatleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API