Legal Opinion

Lee v. Vreeland

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 6, 1925No. 1723PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding in which priority was awarded the senior party, Vreeland. The invention is a method and apparatus for receiving continuous or undamped wireless signaling waves, and is defined in six counts, of which the second and fourth, here reproduced, are sufficiently illustrative:

“2. The method of wireless signaling which comprises exciting a receiver circuit by the received wave energy and also by an auxiliary alternating current of a frequency so related to the frequency of the received energy as to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lee v. VreelandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. UttechtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API