Legal Opinion
Lee v. Vreeland
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 6, 1925No. 1723PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding in which priority was awarded the senior party, Vreeland. The invention is a method and apparatus for receiving continuous or undamped wireless signaling waves, and is defined in six counts, of which the second and fourth, here reproduced, are sufficiently illustrative:
“2. The method of wireless signaling which comprises exciting a receiver circuit by the received wave energy and also by an auxiliary alternating current of a frequency so related to the frequency of the received energy as to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lee v. VreelandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. UttechtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019