Legal Opinion

Rash v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 1, 1996No. Record 950896PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

I

In this appeal, we consider issues that arose during the trial of a suit in equity for a breach of contract, tortious interference with contractual relations, and common law conspiracy.

II

Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Company of Richmond (HRH) filed its amended bill of complaint against Susan M. Rash, Timothy R. Rash, and Rash & Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation. HRH alleged that Mr. Rash breached his employment agreement, which included a covenant not to compete. HRH further alleged that Mrs. Rash tortiously interfered with its contractual relations and that Mr. and Mrs. Rash had engaged in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Leonard v. CountsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  3. D.C. McClain, Inc. v. Arlington CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  4. United Leasing Corp. v. Thrift Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  5. Foti v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Prospect Development Co. v. BershaderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  2. Lenz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  3. Reid v. BoyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  4. Modern Environments, Inc. v. StinnettSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  5. Hoffman Family, L.L.C. v. Mill Two Associates PartnershipSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API