Rash v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell
I
In this appeal, we consider issues that arose during the trial of a suit in equity for a breach of contract, tortious interference with contractual relations, and common law conspiracy.
II
Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Company of Richmond (HRH) filed its amended bill of complaint against Susan M. Rash, Timothy R. Rash, and Rash & Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation. HRH alleged that Mr. Rash breached his employment agreement, which included a covenant not to compete. HRH further alleged that Mrs. Rash tortiously interfered with its contractual relations and that Mr. and Mrs. Rash had engaged in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Leonard v. CountsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- D.C. McClain, Inc. v. Arlington CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
- United Leasing Corp. v. Thrift Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1994
- Foti v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Prospect Development Co. v. BershaderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- Lenz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Reid v. BoyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Modern Environments, Inc. v. StinnettSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Hoffman Family, L.L.C. v. Mill Two Associates PartnershipSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.