Davies v. Oxenreider
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 241, Oct. T., 1909, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., March T., 1907, No. 82, on verdict for defendants in case of Edward Davies v. Sarah K. Oxenreider. Feigned issue to determine the ownership to farming implements. Before Ermentrout, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 241, Oct. T., 1909, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., March T., 1907, No. 82, on verdict for defendants in case of Edward Davies v. Sarah K. Oxenreider. Feigned issue to determine the ownership to farming implements. Before Ermentrout, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court charged in part as follows: [I consider the question whether possession has been taken purely a legal question in this case, and hold, first, that when there is a sale of personal property, it is not good against the creditors of the vendor, unless possession…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
On June 20, 1902, William M. Oxenreider, executed and delivered a judgment note to Sara B. Ernst for $359.89, and on July 7, a like, note to Sara K. Oxenreider, for $500. At the time of making these notes William M. Oxenreider was a tenant farmer, and the owner of considerable stock and implements which were used by him on the Leonhart farm. During that year, by reason of a fire, he lost considerable of his stock and farming implements. In March, 1903, he moved to the farm of David W. Mogel, who occupied one-half of the mansion house, and Oxenreider occupied the other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- White v. GunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Barlow v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Garretson v. Hackenberg, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Potter County1891
- McCullough v. WilleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Bell v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.