Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Kazules
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 27, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennet, J.
In the trial of the defendant in the Superior Court upon two complaints, one charging illegal sale of intoxicating liquors, and the other the maintenance of a liquor nuisance, there was evidence of sale and of conduct indicating guilt. Evidence was admitted without objection that people went into the defendant’s premises and there remained five or ten minutes, that upon coming out some went down the street into bushes and drank from bottles, and that others were under the influence of. intoxicating liquor.
The nationality of the defendant is not disclosed by the record, but the briefs state…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FinnertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Tannehill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Shelp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Searle v. Roman Catholic Bishop of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Funches v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. HearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. LaraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Abbate v. SolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Allen v. GuarenteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.