Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Sheehan

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 19, 1932Published

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

Upon the evidence I find that the claim of Ida Hagen must be disallowed. The claim is for services rendered in nursing the decedent from November 7, 1929, to the date of death, a period of approximately one hundred and forty days. The claimant was not a trained or registered nurse, nor even a practical nurse. She asserts, however, that she is entitled to the sum of twenty-five *494dollars a day. The evidence discloses no agreement, expressed or implied, on the part of the decedent to pay for the alleged services. The claimant had resided in the home of the decedent for several years…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Frankenberger v. SchnellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. In re the Estate of QuinnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API