Legal Opinion

Bartley v. Pringle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2011PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Since the child is now over 18 years of age, she is no longer subject to the order appealed from, and the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Merando v Vantassel, 66 AD3d 783 [2009]). Mastro, A.F.J., Eng, Belen and Hall, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Merando v. VantasselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Julian B. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Julian B. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Hershko v. HershkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Matter of De Oliveira v. De OliveiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Hershko v. HershkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API